naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Re: Very quiet recordings

Subject: 5. Re: Very quiet recordings
From: "soundings23" soundings23
Date: Wed Jun 6, 2012 7:02 am ((PDT))
I never ask that people don't converse on sound walks I've organised (for b=
oth adults and children) - i like people to be able to comminicate what the=
y are hearing - I view it as a shared exploration and exchange of perspecti=
ves. My experience is that there are times when people chat, and times when=
 they listen, simple as that really. But clearly there's more than one way =
to do a sound walk

And silence is a contested word as the views here indicate. Me - I personal=
ly agree with you and think its application is wrong, but there are other v=
iews.

Originally however I was actually more interested experiences of "quiet" - =
an experience that like you I enjoy as well.

all the best

Tony

--- In  "Jez" <> wrote:
>
> well, apart from the 'telling' bit about the fact that the conversation h=
ad to fall away in the first place on a 'sound walk' :)
>
> the whole 'silence' question really comes down to the fact that it isn't =
so much contested as simply wrong & the use of it aids the process of ignor=
ing whats there. If quiet places / times are referred to as 'silent' then t=
here is (has been) a gradual erosion of one part of the awareness of listen=
ing.
>
> This is where 'quietude' comes in - its the right term imo as it describe=
s both places & times where available sound ebbs away & the atmosphere beco=
mes inhabited with a sense of quiet & stillness.
>
> I know lots of folks on here are more interested in the scientific approa=
ch to sound & on that level there is never silence of course as there are u=
ltra & infra sound signals along with the small sounds we can hear.
>
> as for myself, I just enjoy these times, these places & the sense of bein=
g enveloped in quietude.
>
> --- In  "soundings23" <tony.whitehead233=
2@> wrote:
> >
> > Clearly "silence" is a contested word, but personally I don't have any =
issue with not attributing it to situations that might better be described =
as quiet.
> >
> > The differing experiences of "quiet" are however very interesting.
> >
> > Years ago, I was standing with a group of people at night (composers/so=
und artists on a course as it happened) by the River Dart here in Devon. We=
 were on a sound walk and it was a particularly still August evening. Conve=
rsation fell away and we became still. As we did so I felt a "rushing in" -=
 an almost physical pressure. It was quite startling, but I've experienced =
it a number of times since when I've purposefully put myself in similar sit=
uations. Its the sort of experience that is personal and no recording techn=
ology could replicate - but I recognise it in experiences related in this t=
hread.
> >
> > I don't wish to overanalyse, but I'd be intrigued in a wider sharing of=
 experiences of such quiet places to see if there's any commonality, or if =
our experience's differ widely.
> >
> > --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > >
> > > quickly:
> > >
> > > these 'silences' aren't silent. What tends to happen is the extreme q=
uietness combined with the listeners attempts to perceive it lead to a situ=
ation where:
> > >
> > > 1) on a psychological level, one accepts the definition of silence
> > > 2) on a physical level, the ears attempt to adjust to the surrounding=
s & to 1)
> > >
> > > the combination means that 'silence' is the surface perception. There=
 are all kinds of sounds present, even in the disorienting stillness of the=
 most quiet places on earth (such as deep caves or deserts) but, as is the =
way of us humans, it is easier for us to apply filters to our perception of=
 what is there.
> > >
> > > micro / macro listening to these places or recordings of them reveals=
 a wealth of sound, all be it on a sometimes very subtle level.
> > >
> > > it's amazing to perceive stillness & amazing to hear whats there at t=
hose times.
> > >
> > > --- In  404 <404@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for this, Raimund. Fascinating stuff!
> > > >
> > > > On 05 Jun 2012, at 19:39, Raimund wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > <But every now and then there's moments where the wind lies down =
and the
> > > > > flies stay away and it's silent. Not quiet. But silent. I'm sure =
that anyone who's ever driven into the Australian outback or desert know wh=
at I'm talking about. I can highly recommend it>
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I know what you are talking about. I experienced that stu=
nning silence several times shortly after sunset while camping in the Sonor=
an Desert (Arizona).
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a simple explanation for that kind of silence: A strong =
temperature gradient in the air above the ground creates a sonic shadow reg=
ion for each sound source (the ground is still hot, but the air is getting =
cooler at night). See http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/refract/refract=
.html. So, I think there is still some noise around, but it just cannot be =
heard due to these refraction effects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Raimund
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU