naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: New Telinga SoundScapeMic

Subject: 1. Re: New Telinga SoundScapeMic
From: "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg
Date: Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:28 pm ((PDT))
Thank you,

Please send your address to me privately, and I will send you the
necessary stuff for connecting a battery.

Klas.


At 23:00 2012-03-22, you wrote:
>I opened the file in Audacity and viewed the frequency analysis. It
>looks way better than mine, without the little spikes every 400Hz.
>
>If I view the spectrogram (FFT window size 1024), I can see a few
>bands clearly at 2.4k, 3.7k and 8k, maybe this is some sort of
>environmental noise, very faint but fairly constant through the recording.
>
>I can also see other faint bands that might be evenly spaced like
>mine, but very faint and coming and going, perhaps corresponding
>with you moving the recorder around. If mine had been that faint
>then I would never have noticed them. I didn't try to establish
>their frequencies because they're so faint and I think I'd have to
>enhance them somehow first.
>
>I've attached a screen dump, with black dots added where I think I see a b=
and.
>
>I've never looked this closely at recordings from other microphones
>I have access to (ME66 and M10 internals), and maybe I'd see
>something similar and faint with those too. It's as you described,
>looking at a Rembrandt with an xray machine, but in this case also
>an xray machine in the hands of a beginner - I don't know if my
>tests are valid or meaningful.
>
>But as others have pointed out elsewhere, the M10's PiP isn't able
>to supply as much voltage to 4 capsules as the LS11, so perhaps your
>mics will do a little worse with it. I'm still blaming poor wiring
>for at least some of my problems, but until I try the battery box I won't =
know.
>
>Peter Shute
>
>----------
>From: Klas Strandberg 
>Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 7:16 AM
>To: Peter Shute
>Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] New Telinga SoundScapeMic
>Peter,
>I put a 10s .wav file on top of the Telinga Demo site.
>Please download and analyze in the same way as you did when you
>discovered your problems.
>I hold the mic capsules as close that I can near the display.
>Klas
>
>At 03:19 2012-03-22, you wrote:
>>That's an excellent idea. I think one of either Avisoft or Raven
>>can do real time sonograms, or maybe even Audacity. I'll set it up
>>and try some real time monitoring goijng.
>>
>>But merely keeping the recorder further away is probably good
>>enough for now. I was concerned that the low voltage might be
>>causing other problems I didn't know about, so I won't worry so
>>much about that now.
>>
>>Peter Shute
>>----------
>>From: Klas Strandberg [ 
>>Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:50 PM
>>To: Peter Shute
>>Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] New Telinga SoundScapeMic
>>I wish I had some good ideas Peter.
>>If you were here, we would start by placing the recorder at one
>>place and the mic nearby and see if there is a way to monitor the
>>disturbance in real time.
>>Then connect a metal mesh to ground and move the mesh around to see
>>what happens.
>>And connect a alu-foil to ground and put it on the display.
>>Such things.
>>You are welcome to mail me in private, if you like.
>>Klas.
>>
>>
>>
>>At 02:27 2012-03-22, you wrote:
>>>Definitely not random. With 4 connected, it picked up interference
>>>strongly, presumably square wave because it appeared as evenly
>>>spaced band when I looked at the sonogram. It did this every time
>>>the recorder was close to the mics, and I noticed it because in my
>>>first test I placed the recorder right on top of the SASS box.
>>>
>>>It was suggested it might be because the voltage was too low. I
>>>measured it at about 0.5V, and disconnected two of them. At 1.3V
>>>it now still picks up the interference, but nowhere near as
>>>strongly. It's mainly in one channel, the one with the cable
>>>running across the box to the other side.
>>>
>>>Both recordings sounded ok to me, although someone said they could
>>>hear a hum on the one made with 4 capsules.
>>>
>>>It is possible that there's a faulty capsule, now disconected. I
>>>haven't tried just the other pair yet.
>>>
>>>It might be that in normal use people keep their recorder much
>>>further from the mics, and use much better quality cable than I
>>>did. In order to get it together quickly I used cables recovered
>>>from damaged cheap earphones, etc, and I doubt the shielding is much goo=
d.
>>>----------
>>>From: Klas Strandberg [ 
>>>Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:12 PM
>>>To: Peter Shute
>>>Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] New Telinga SoundScapeMic
>>>Hi Peter!
>>>I cannot explain that two em172 took up more of disturbances than
>>>one. Can it be random?? There are many factors involved here, not
>>>only the driving voltage.
>>>The prototypes of the Telinga SSM has been made out of plastic
>>>only and no special shielding.
>>>The commercial ones will be out of aluminium.
>>>Klas
>>>At 05:00 2012-03-21, you wrote:
>>>>Klas, my recent trial of 2 pairs of EM172s powered by the Sony
>>>>M10's PiP sounded ok, but the recording revealed interference
>>>>from the M10 (the display?) that is much reduced in a recording
>>>>made with just one pair of EM172s. It was suggested that trying
>>>>to drive the four capsules made them more sensitive to this
>>>>interference, and I'm building a battery box to test that.
>>>>
>>>>So your array might be more sensitive to interference? You've
>>>>likely shielded it far better than I did, but could it be an issue?
>>>>
>>>>Peter Shute
>>>>----------
>>>>From:  [
>>>> On Behalf Of Klas Strandberg
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 1:49 PM
>>>>To: 
>>>>Subject: [Nature Recordists] New Telinga SoundScapeMic
>>>>Hello!
>>>>After my last posting, see below, I have got questions about the new
>>>>SoundScapeMic and Zoom / Sony Plug in power.
>>>>Here are my results from measuring and listening:
>>>>The driving voltage was taken from a variable power supply, filtered
>>>>by 150 Ohms and 470 mfd to ground, then 2,2 kOhms to the drains of
>>>>two EM172. The output was connected to the recorder input via a 1 mfd
>>>>tantalum condenser. The recorders PIP voltage was "off".
>>>>The mics were placed in front of loudspeaker giving 100db SPL at 440
>>>>Hz. sine wave.
>>>>For reference: 100 db SPL and 1v driving voltage =3D 0db output.
>>>>I could not measure distortion, but the sine wave at the oscilloscope
>>>>looked fine.
>>>>Measurements were made at 0,5v / 0,7v / 1v /2v and 3volts.
>>>>The output from the mics were less than 5 db more at 3v than at 0,5v
>>>>and the mic self noise followed.
>>>>Conclusion: Two EM172 give a higher output at a higher driving
>>>>voltage, but the noise follows the output.
>>>>So two em172 / channel will work fine on PIP with all modern
>>>>recorders and there seems is be no need to build extra boxes with
>>>>9v batteries.
>>>>Klas
>>>>As I have posted on the Naturerecordist list a number of times, I
>>>>have been intensely busy designing a new mic system especially
>>>>calibrated for SoundScapes. This odyssey began
>>>>at the 2009 Murie Center Workshop that Bernie, Martyn, and Kevin put
>>>>together in Wyoming.
>>>>While the early designs had some spatial and imaging issues, this new
>>>>system is spot on!
>>>>Please visit <http://klas.telinga.com/demo>http://klas.telinga.com/demo
>>>>(All recordings done with Olympus LS-11 on High sens, 8 to 10 on the
>>>>wheel and 24bit.)
>>>>Frankly, I love this mic! Main features: It is light-weight, easy to
>>>>use, small to pack down in a suitcase, not sensitive to wind and
>>>>handling noise and runs very low noise on PlugInPower.
>>>>The sound character is big and transparent. Listening to the sound, I
>>>>lean back and relax, undisturbed by too much of side, harsh or
>>>>metallic coloring.
>>>>Sitting in the bush, monitoring with my Beyer headphones, taking the
>>>>Beyer's on and off, comparing the sound I get from the mics with what
>>>>I hear with my ears only, - it's the
>>>>only stereo rig so far that gives me a realistic sound image of wind.
>>>>I especially love the ambient sounds of the forest. The forest is big
>>>>and the acoustic imaging is as real as it gets.
>>>>Hope you enjoy!
>>>>Klas
>>>>Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>>>>S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>>>>Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>>>>email: <telinga%40bahnhof.se>
>>>>website: www.telinga.com
>>>>
>>Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>>S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>>Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>>email: 
>>website: www.telinga.com
>>
>Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>email: 
>website: www.telinga.com
>
>Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>email: 
>website: www.telinga.com
>

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
website: www.telinga.com












"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU