That would be me. In the case of the interference I recently found with my =
M10 and 4 EM172s, there were several reasons I was concerned about it, desp=
ite not being able to hear it myself:
- I could see it very plainly in bands across the sonogram. I look at sonog=
rams a lot, and I don't want them obscured by bands, even if I can't hear t=
hem.
- My hearing isn't great, and it may be that others can hear what I can't.
- The background was noisy in my tests, and I didn't want to discover some =
day that there was noise that was audible in a quiet environment.
But rather than being critical of this Telinga design because of this, I'm =
confident enough of Klas's design abilities that it gives me hope that all =
I need to do is wire my mics up more competently, perhaps with better quali=
ty cable, and the problem will be solved.
Peter Shute
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> On Behalf Of Klas Strandberg
> Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:53 AM
> To:
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Telinga SSM, display noise and more.
> There have been postings about radiating displays:
> All recorders I know of have a radiating display. It is a
> matter of how close the mic's are and cable shielding and
> probably other factors. Even Nagra had problems with one of
> their most professional models and I heard (true?) that they
> had supplied a transparent conductive tape to glue on top of
> the display.
> During my some 40 hours of testing the SoundScapeMic with the
> Olympus LS-11, I have had no problems with the display. The
> recorder has been in a bag about a foot away from the Olympus.
>
> But I don't think it is right to blame either
> Sony/Zoom/Olympus/Tascam as the worst. I think "it depends..."
> Plus that I sometimes get a bit annoyed when people say that
> "there is no way that I can hear this noise, but if I make a
> spectrum analysis.."
> Please... don=B4t look at a Rembrandt with an x-ray camera.
|