naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

[Nature Recordists] EM172 capsule frequency response

To:
Subject: [Nature Recordists] EM172 capsule frequency response
From: Paul <>
Does anyone know what it is for sure?  I'm about ready to order some from
frogloggers, but I want something with as wide a F.R. as possible.
Particularly, I want/need low frequency and low self noise(one of the thing=
s
I'll be recording is wolves, and want to catch the deep base).  The Primo
datasheet does not seem to spell out the response, but the graphic part of =
the
sheet seems to indicate a pretty limited response of no lower then 100 hz. =
 If
that's the case...are there ANY other affordable low self noise capsules ou=
t
there with a better frequency response?   And if it is the case...does anyo=
ne
have any experience with them, how well they do in the real world with lowe=
r
frequency's?












<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Nature Recordists] EM172 capsule frequency response, Paul <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU