No offense taken. I can see that the discussions about the possible species=
might be confusing, but often attempts to rename minor sub threads end in =
further confusion when some parties continue with the new thread and some c=
ontinue with the old.=0D
=0D
Even more so when the sub topics are closely enough related that there's a =
strong possibility of a reply that returns to the original topic.=0D
=0D
I should probably have had the foresight to include a request for species i=
d in the original subject line, as I knew there were list members who might=
be able to help with it.=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
=0D
--------------------------=0D
Sent using BlackBerry=0D
=0D
________________________________=0D
From: =0D
To: =0D
Sent: Wed Dec 07 23:43:11 2011=0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Advice needed for cleaning up this recordi=
ng: Kind request to change the subject line!=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
Peter Shute said:=0D
=0D
> Has the topic changed? I thought we were still talking about cleaning up=
=0D
> the recording. We've also discussed the species in the recording, and som=
e=0D
> have discussed techniques used on other recordings, but I didn't think we=
'd=0D
> drifted too far off topic.=0D
=0D
My idea was just that some of the side-topics might have deserved to start =
a thread of their own. I personally found it somewhat difficult to follow. =
But I did not mean to offend anybody...=0D
=0D
Volker=0D
--=0D
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zur=C3=BCck-Garantie!=0D
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone=0D
=0D
=0D
|