Vicki, that was suggested on the birding-aus list too (frog distress call),=
but someone discounted it - "they don't repeate them rythmically". Is that=
not correct?=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
=0D
--------------------------=0D
Sent using BlackBerry=0D
=0D
________________________________=0D
From: =0D
To: =0D
Sent: Mon Nov 28 00:00:39 2011=0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Advice needed for cleaning up this rec=
ording=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
That was a good clean up Mike!=0D
=0D
For the call itself, it is very similar to the distress call of a=0D
Green Tree Frog.=0D
=0D
I am not familiar enough with the owls to know if it could be a young=0D
owl.=0D
=0D
Vicki=0D
=0D
On 27/11/2011, at 9:35 AM, hartogj wrote:=0D
=0D
> Hi Mike, I think that worked on the insect sounds really well.=0D
>=0D
> John Hartog=0D
> rockscallop.org=0D
>=0D
> --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoogr=
oups.com>, "Mike Rooke" <> wrote:=0D
>>=0D
>> Heres my attempt, SNR is quite poor.=0D
>>=0D
>> http://urlme.net/audio/t98proc.mp3=0D
>>=0D
>> Steps:-=0D
>> MS processing, background noise subtracted in baudline, rendered=0D
>> into reaper.=0D
>> processed with dynamic eq and apeq.=0D
>>=0D
>> Might be better to replace the ambient floor with noise or gate=0D
>> it, the bird call is between=0D
>> 5khz to 10khz=0D
>>=0D
>> -Mike.=0D
>>=0D
>> --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoog=
roups.com>, Peter Shute <pshute@> wrote:=0D
>>>=0D
>>> That's the track, but what have you done to it? It sounds=0D
>>> decidedly weird, with lots of strange clicks and pops (I think=0D
>>> these are raindrops) and echos.=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Peter Shute=0D
>>>=0D
>>> ________________________________=0D
>>> From: <naturerecordists%40yahoog=
roups.com>=0D
>>> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups=
.com>] On Behalf Of Avocet =0D
>>> Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2011 1:56 PM=0D
>>> To: <naturerecordists%40yahoogro=
ups.com>=0D
>>> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Advice needed for cleaning up=0D
>>> this recording=0D
>>>=0D
>>>=0D
>>>=0D
>>>> http://www.aviceda.org/audio/?p=3D208=0D
>>>=0D
>>>> The problem is that the call is distant and masked by frog and=0D
>>>> insect calls. Can anyone suggest techniques for cleaning it up to=0D
>>>> make the call clearer?=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Peter,=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Do you mean this one:=0D
>>> http://www.stowford.org/sounds/tt98_edit_redux.mp3=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Because of the distance, the call is rather smudged by reverb.=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Best Wishes, David=0D
>>>=0D
>>> David Brinicombe=0D
>>> North Devon, UK=0D
>>> Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce=0D
>>>=0D
>>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
|