Subject: | Re: Wind sensitivity |
---|---|
From: | "Peter Shute" pshute2 |
Date: | Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:19 pm ((PDT)) |
Of course. Thanks.=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D =0D =0D --------------------------=0D Sent using BlackBerry=0D =0D ________________________________=0D From: =0D To: =0D Sent: Mon Sep 26 05:38:12 2011=0D Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Wind sensitivity=0D =0D =0D =0D > I've seen the occasional reference here to some microphones being more se= nsitive to wind than others, and assumed it was because of something about = their shape making them catch the wind more. But surely once they're inside= some sort of wind cover, they're all equal in that regard?=0D =0D Omnis are less wind-sensitive than any directional mic.=0D =0D -Dan=0D =0D =0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Wind sensitivity, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Wind sensitivity, Mike Rooke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Wind sensitivity, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Wind sensitivity, Mike Rooke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU