Much lower electronic noise floor with the MKH-60, and hence more potential
reach and depth. I'm quite familiar with both mics in a human voice
recording capacity, and MUCH prefer the sound of the MKH.
Never used either for nature recording, so others might have knowledge I
don't.
-j
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Andrew Spencer <> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am a bird sound recordist and bird guide living in Ecuador.
> Normally I record with a Telinga pro Universal and mkh20 mic, coupled
> with a Sound Devices 702, but while I'm guiding I can't carry around
> the parabola. So during those times I use a Sennheiser me66/k6 setup.
> I was wondering if there was enough of an advantage to using the
> mkh60 mic to make it worth the added cost. I realize that I won't get
> the quality with either setup that I do with the parabola, but as I so
> often hear interesting vocalizations that I want to record while
> guiding I would like the best possible recording given the situation.
>
> Thanks for any advice the you can give,
>
> Andrew Spencer
> Quito, Ecuador
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
jeremiah moore | SOUND |
http://www.jeremiahmoore.com/
|