I know this thread is a bit old but as I can't find a follow up on this uni=
t
I thought I'd post a link to a quick non-scientific, more hands on blog pos=
t
review I've published on the LS-5 -
http://www.happyorange.org.uk/olympus-ls-5-review-first-impressions/
The only comparable unit I have is a Zoom H2, not any of the other LS units=
.
I hope it's useful.
James
On 19 July 2010 21:30, Tom Williams <> wrote:
>
>
> I asked Olympus on their Twitter account how the LS-5 differs from the
> LS-10, and the reply was "Pretty much identical. Only real difference is
> that the LS-5 does not include the Cubase software."
>
> So yes, I think we'll have to wait for someone to actually buy and test o=
ne
> before we know for certain what the differences are!
>
> All the best,
>
> Tom
>
>
> --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.co=
m>,
> Ricardo Reis <> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Tom Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Based on a quick look at the specs on the Olympus site it seems to be
> an
> > > LS-10 without the remote control and carrying case. Maybe I've missed
> > > something, or maybe there's internal changes (different mics/preamp)
> that
> > > don't show up in the specs....
> >
> > it says it has the same mics has the LS11... and can work as a soundcar=
d.
>
> > It also says it has better autonomy than the LS10 (double almost). But
> how
> > to know before someone using one?
> >
> > and I've just checked Thomman and it goes for 179... which is sweet
> > price... much lower than my LS10 :((
> >
> > Ricardo Reis
> >
> > 'Non Serviam'
> >
> > PhD candidate @ Lasef
> > Computational Fluid Dynamics, High Performance Computing, Turbulence
> > http://www.lasef.ist.utl.pt
> >
> > Cultural Instigator @ R=E1dio Zero
> > http://www.radiozero.pt
> >
> > Keep them Flying! Ajude a/help Aero F=E9nix!
> >
> > http://www.aeronauta.com/aero.fenix
> >
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/rreis/
> >
> > < sent with alpine 2.00 >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
http://www.happyorange.org.uk
|