> also wouldnt the type of interpoliation used come in to play here ?
Hi Gus,
As long as we are talking about the theoretic principles of digital samplin=
g, the type of interpolation should not be an issue. However, there might b=
e poor implementations of D/A converters or sample rate conversion algorith=
ms that suffer from inappropriate interpolation algorithms. But as far as I=
understand, this wouldn't be the problem here.
> > If I understand correctly David is saying the lower the frequency the h=
igher the resoulution.
>For example if the sampling as 44.1 khz if you have a frequency of 10
>khz you will have 4 samples of information representing that signal -
>if 22 khz only 2 etc etc it may only be half that come to think of it >but=
you get the gist.....
Yes, this is true. However, this not mean that there is anything wrong with=
signals that are close to the Nyquist frequency. Increasing the sample rat=
e would just increase the (analog) bandwidth of the recorder, which would o=
f course also provide more temporal details on the waveform.
Regards,
Raimund
|