Subject: | Re: High frequency recording |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
Date: | Tue Nov 9, 2010 1:23 am ((PST)) |
> Previous posters on the subject mentioned a 10% security margin between > the Nyquist frequency and the highest frequencies that might be of interest. Just another note: Actually, the 10% security margin would only be sufficient on a few recorders that come with a very steep anti-aliasing filter. On a SD7xx recorder, operated at 192 kHz for instance, the security margin should be much higher. Here I would perhaps recommend something like 50%, depending on the frequency response of the microphone and the frequency content to be recorded. See also Gianni's comprehensive tests at http://www-3.unipv.it/cibra/res_techtest_uk.html Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: High frequency recording, Raimund |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Cataloging Sounds, ng2307 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: High frequency recording, Raimund |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: High frequency recording, Avocet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU