naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Digest Number 4799

Subject: Re: Digest Number 4799
From: "Fred Israel" etheroot
Date: Fri Sep 3, 2010 2:13 am ((PDT))
Remove

On Sep 3, 2010, at 5:09 AM,  wrote:

> E-Mail group of individuals interested i
> Messages In This Digest (10 Messages)
> 1a.
> Re: Rode ntg3 on the field, anyone? From: Flawn Williams
> 2.1.
> Re: ORTF Recommendations From: myles.thompson
> 3a.
> iPad From: thorley_tom
> 3b.
> Re: iPad From: thorley_tom
> 4.
> MKH 40 Pair / ORTF configuration From: myles.thompson
> 5a.
> Re: mic arrays and M/S behaviour From: Luiz do Carmo
> 6a.
> Flammulated Owl From: kjcolver
> 6b.
> Re: Flammulated Owl From: Martyn Stewart
> 6c.
> Re: Flammulated Owl From: Kevin Colver
> 7a.
> Re: MOTU Traveler. Was "Mic arrays and M/S behaviour" From: Luiz do
> Carmo
> View All Topics | Create New Topic
> Messages
> 1a.
> Re: Rode ntg3 on the field, anyone?
> Posted by: "Flawn Williams"  =C2=A0 flawn1951
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 5:30=C2=A0am (PDT)
>
>
> I do not have personal experience with the NTG-3. But it is built
> using an 'RF condenser' design similar to what Sennheiser has done for
> years with its 416 and MKH series. And that, according to Sennheiser
> and now Rode, is what gives the mikes excellent protection against
> problems in high heat and high humidity.
>
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:47 AM,  wrote:
>
> > 6a. Rode ntg3 on the field, anyone?
> > Posted by: "lamacchiacosta"  lamacchiacosta
> > Date: Wed Sep 1, 2010 1:42 pm ((PDT))
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> > I would like to know if someone on the list owning a Rode ntg3 has
> > some feedback using it on the field and on location.
> > How is his behaviour on very high humidity and extreme temperature
> > condition?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance.
> >
> > Eamnuele
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (3)
> 2.1.
> Re: ORTF Recommendations
> Posted by: "myles.thompson"  =C2=A0 myles.thompson
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 6:00=C2=A0am (PDT)
>
>
>
> Sounds like an excellent set-up with the wind protection accessories
> included. But it also seems to have different mics: the outdoor set
> uses CCM4's, while the 'indoor' MSTC 64 set uses MK4's. I guess that
> also affects the cost. I got a quote for 4721 EUR for the outdoor
> set and 2899 EUR for the 'naked' indoor set (without wind protection).
>
> --- In  "E_Karel" <> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In  "myles.thompson"
> <mmyleso@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The outdoor set looks interesting - but it's considerably more
> expensive.
> >
> > Yes, but it includes the suspension, ConnBox, and wind protection,
> which you'll need outside. With the MSTC, you're limited to the
> separate small baskets on each mic, which doesn't offer nearly the
> wind protection of a full zeppelin. So including this cost, it's not
> actually much more expensive.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --- In  "E_Karel" <ekarel@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Schoeps in ORTF is fantastic. But for outdoor work, rather
> than the MSTC 64 U, they now offer this combination using the
> compact series, which looks perfect:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/ortf-stereo-outdoor
> > > >
> > > > _Ernst
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (32)
> 3a.
> iPad
> Posted by: "thorley_tom"  =C2=A0 thorley_tom
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 11:13=C2=A0am (PDT)
>
>
> Did not find anything about this in the forums - sorry to be long
> winded if it has already been raised...
>
> "This post is more for the benefit of people searching for this
> information than regular readers, who (I assume) already know this.
> I conducted some experiments with this a few days ago for an article
> I was writing for CM, and have since figured out some new things, so
> I thought I'd share them.
> Q: Can I use a USB audio interface with an iPad? A: Yup. There are
> some caveats, and they need to be paid attention to, but in general
> it Just Works.
>
> Q: Caveats? You're gonna drop Latin in to this x? A: That's how I
> roll. Seriously, though, as far as my experimentation shows, the
> following information is true: first, the interface has to be class-
> compliant. That means that it needs to work in an OS X computer
> without a driver install. Second, it has to be USB1.0-compatible. No
> USB2.0-only interfaces. And finally, it has to either use less than
> 200ma of power or be externally powered.
>
> Q: Hold on, let me get my... what? A: A safe rule of thumb is that
> if it has mic pres (especially if it's able to provide phantom
> power) it's going to need a wall wart or something.
>
> Q: Okay. Got it. What else do I need? A: Pop over to the nearest
> Apple store and get yourself a Camera Connection Kit. This otherwise
> useless =C2=A325.32 adaptor plugs in to the 30-pin docking port and gives=

> you a USB port, ostensibly for hooking up cameras that have only on-
> board memory. As a camera connection kit, it's kind of stupid,
> because you can buy SD cards now that have as much storage as even a
> maxed-out iPad, so I'm unclear as to its stated purpose and the
> usefulness thereof. But as an audio adapter, it works fine.
>
> Q: Okay. Last question. Does every audio app just sound out the
> interface when it is plugged in? A: Nope.
>
> Long answer: there are several ways to give a program sound in Cocoa
> Touch. These are, on the whole, the same ways as in OS X proper. You
> can use OpenAL, but that's just a sample playback engine, really.
> There is also a system sound engine, or you can programically access
> the part of the OS concerned with playing back MP3s/AAC/whatever if
> you'd like. The final method, and the one that gives you bit-level
> access to the outputs, is to talk to CoreAudio, just like in OS X.
>
> This final method is poorly documented and hideously complex, and
> even big companies x it up occasionally. But this is, as far as I
> can ascertain, the only method by which the USB outputs are utilized.
>
> So, long story short: any App that uses CoreAudio for its playback,
> and does a good job of using it, automatically shunts its inputs (if
> it has 'em) and outputs to the USB device. Applications that use
> OpenAL (games for the most part, but some audio programs like the
> ridiculous-bordering-on-stupid Magic Piano, and many sample playback
> apps of that ilk) send the audio to the headphone jack or the
> onboard speakers only. Apps that use the system sound engine or
> access the iTunes library in some crafty way also can't access this
> method.
>
> One exception to this rule is Korg's iElectribe. As I said,
> CoreAudio in Cocoa Touch is incredibly complicated and poorly
> documented, and even big companies mess it up. iElectribe is an
> example of that. iElectribe _must_ use CoreAudio; it wouldn't work
> any other way. However, when a USB audio device is plugged in,
> iElectribe crashes on start-up. This will no doubt bum some people
> out.
>
> And last but not least: all that x I said about the iPad above? It
> also applies to the iPhone. (And I assume the iPod Touch, although
> I've not verified this.) I will say, however, that I have OS4 in my
> iPhone, so I can't say for certain that it works with OS3.1. If
> someone has a CCK and an iPhone with OS3.1 and wants to verify this,
> that would be cool.
>
> EDIT: I just tried it with my wife's iPhone, which is running 3.1,
> and it DOES NOT WORK. So if you were planning on going to get a
> Camera Connection Kit just to use audio from your iPhone or iPod
> Touch, you need to wait until OS4 is released for this to work. It
> works fine with OS4, though, essentially the same as with the iPad."
>
> this has mostly been tested by hifi buffs but i would assume the
> micport pro would also be compliant...
>
> Confirmed works
> - Nuforce uDAC [Skylab, Headphoneaddict, uofmtiger, torcik]
> - DacMagic [uofmtiger]
> - Xitel Pro Hifi-Link [deadie]
> - Predator [jc9394] (have to put the volume to 100%)
> - iBasso D4 [Headphoneaddict]
> - iBasso D1 [trickywombat]
> - iBasso D3 [hypoicon]
> - iBasso D10 [qusp - doesn't work; HeadphoneAddict, rhw - works
> (charging off)]
> - Pico DAC [Headphoneaddict, warp08]
> - Micro II usb/digital [kredmore]
> - Headroom Total BitHead [qin]
> - Headroom Desktop Portable amp w/DAC [muski]
> - TTVJ Portable w/DAC [grawk]
> - TTVJ Slim DAC/Amp [gopack87]
> - Fiio E7 [Jack-Micca, feiao]
> - C&C F1U USB DAC/Amp [phytonix]
> - Meier Corda Symphony DAC/Amp [Noumenon]
> - Little Dot Dac1 [uofmtiger]
> - devilsound v2.1 dac [decur]
> - Music Hall DAC 25.2 [Skylab]
> - Vivid Technologies V1 USB DAC HD AMP [ccklone]
> - Valab NOS USB DAC [ccklone]
> - Aune USB DAC/AMP [ccklone]
> - Sigtone h1 - without any trouble [rhw]
> - USB monica NOS DAC - no problems [rhw]
> - DACport (works after flash update) [HeadphoneAddict]
> - HA Info NG Coax USB to SPDIF Converter [rhw]
>
> Issues(?):
> - Headphonia DAC cable [qc98, shigzeo - works; utdeep - works but
> seems "lifeless"]
> - PopPulse PCM 1796 DAC [rhw - first an error message, but after
> reconnection works fine]
>
> Doesn't work
> - MobilePre (legacy) [porieux]
> - iQube V2 portable [Skylab]
> - Yulong D100 home DAC [Skylab]
> - PWD [jc9394]
> - uDAC-2 [headphoneaddict]
> - nuForce Icon Mobile [yukster]
> - Hot Audio DAC-Extacy USB DAC [ccklone - dialog box;too much power]
> - M2 Hiface USB stick [ccklone - not really a DAC, but didn't work
> feeding a "known good" DAC]
>
> Further to this I know that several budget pro audio interfaces are
> compatible but do not have a full list I can add...
>
> griffin imic
> edirol ua25
>
> the rest have slipped my memory maybe we could compile a list here?
>
> Personally my needs are for 2ch digital i/o and to this end i am
> going to test the roland UA-1G as it is a simple low profile cheap
> interface with allows me to hook preamps / conversion of my
> choice... Will settle for 2ch now until apps start supporting
> multichannel i/o....
>
> As to the inevitable ergonomics issues that will be brought up cant
> argue with them but still think it is a kinda cool high resolution 2
> track as a backup / toy ;-)
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (2)
> 3b.
> Re: iPad
> Posted by: "thorley_tom"  =C2=A0 thorley_tom
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 11:20=C2=A0am (PDT)
>
>
> btw. I am not sure if this has proven true as re os4 as i was only
> looking into the ipad and this is the only reference i came across
> to iphone / touch but may be interesting to some of you who are into
> researching a more compact setup...
>
> > EDIT: I just tried it with my wife's iPhone, which is running 3.1,
> and it DOES NOT WORK. So if you were planning on going to get a
> Camera Connection Kit just to use audio from your iPhone or iPod
> Touch, you need to wait until OS4 is released for this to work. It
> works fine with OS4, though, essentially the same as with the iPad."
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (2)
> 4.
> MKH 40 Pair / ORTF configuration
> Posted by: "myles.thompson"  =C2=A0 myles.thompson
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 11:20=C2=A0am (PDT)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just got hold of a pair of Sennheiser MKH 40's and I'm
> wondering how to set them up with a convenient wind protection
> system for ORTF recording (or something along those lines). Anyone
> have any experience/advice - or ideally - any pictures of such set-
> ups?
>
> Myles
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (1)
> 5a.
> Re: mic arrays and M/S behaviour
> Posted by: "Luiz do Carmo"  =C2=A0 lecarmo
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 1:55=C2=A0pm (PDT)
>
>
> Thanks Dan.
>
> I=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2m kind of embarassed for my laziness and severe =
lack of
> basic reading. If I
> were otherwise a little more attentive to my own stored files I
> could get the
> texts I had gathered and solve my =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=CB=9Cdoubts=C3=A2=E2=82=
=AC=E2=84=A2. I simply
> didn=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2t do my homework.
>
> Luiz
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dan Dugan <>
> To: 
> Sent: Wed, September 1, 2010 9:16:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] mic arrays and M/S behaviour
>
> > The M/S results are great, but I would like to know which mic
> capsules would be
> >involved in the final mixed sound.
> >
>
> All of them! Well, directly on-axis in front is in the null of the
> side mic, so
> that direction is just the M mic. for direct sound. All other angles
> are blends
> of the two except for straight back which, if M is a cardioid, will
> be in the
> null of both mics and dead, for direct sound.
>
> Since in the real world sound is diffuse, the tonality of all sounds
> is a blend
> of the two mics.
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (19)
> 6a.
> Flammulated Owl
> Posted by: "kjcolver"  =C2=A0 kjcolver
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 4:40=C2=A0pm (PDT)
>
>
> Having left the recorder out all night in a breezy Aspen/Fir
> woodland, I recorded the Flammulated Owl with a Great Horned Owl in
> the distance. It was 2 AM. You can listen at www.7Loons.com or at
> the "Soundscapes for Birders" free podcast at the iTunes Store.
>
> There is one call note that I haven't heard before on any commercial
> bird sound guides. Does anyone recognize it as the Flam Owl?
>
> Recorded with Sound Devices 722 and Sennheiser MKH 30/40 MS pair.
>
> Kevin Colver
>
> www.7Loons.com
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (3)
> 6b.
> Re: Flammulated Owl
> Posted by: "Martyn Stewart"  =C2=A0 mijdog2000
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 7:58=C2=A0pm (PDT)
>
>
> Yes, it is the sound of the Flammulated owl, Kevin.... I have the
> same from Eastern WA...
> The recording however sounds a little tinny, have you posted at a
> low sample rate? Can't get this to play as good as your previous
> posts....
>
> Martyn
> *************************************
> Martyn Stewart
> www.naturesound.org
> www.soundofcritters.com
>
> Redmond WA
> 425-898-0462
>
> 47.65420118705451
> -121.98158740997314
>
> Make every garden a wildlife habitat
> **************************************
> Listen to the Birds and the Bees at
> http://naturesound.libsyn.org/
> ------------------------------------------------
> View a Nature Recordists Blog!
>
> http://naturesound.org/Blog/Blog.html
>
> http://naturesound.org/this_weeks_recordings/
> this_weeks_recordings.html
>
> Follow me on AudioBoo
> feed://audioboo.fm/users/31466/boos.atom
>
> Listen to my sounds on Facebook:
> http://tinyurl.com/ye2dw7p
>
> P please consider the environment before printing this email
>
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:40 PM, kjcolver wrote:
>
> > Having left the recorder out all night in a breezy Aspen/Fir
> woodland, I recorded the Flammulated Owl with a Great Horned Owl in
> the distance. It was 2 AM. You can listen at www.7Loons.com or at
> the "Soundscapes for Birders" free podcast at the iTunes Store.
> >
> > There is one call note that I haven't heard before on any
> commercial bird sound guides. Does anyone recognize it as the Flam
> Owl?
> >
> > Recorded with Sound Devices 722 and Sennheiser MKH 30/40 MS pair.
> >
> > Kevin Colver
> >
> > www.7Loons.com
> >
>
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (3)
> 6c.
> Re: Flammulated Owl
> Posted by: "Kevin Colver"  =C2=A0 kjcolver
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 9:58=C2=A0pm (PDT)
>
>
> Hi Martyn,
>
> Thanks for the confirmation on the owl call ID.
>
> The podcast is much more windy than most I've done and it was
> amplified which brought out some of the wind harmonics. I wondered
> about posting something with all the wind, but decided wind is part of
> nature too, so I gave it a go. I'm going back next spring for another
> try at this bird.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Colver
>
> www.7Loons.com
>
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>
> > Yes, it is the sound of the Flammulated owl, Kevin.... I have the
> > same from Eastern WA...
> > The recording however sounds a little tinny, have you posted at a
> > low sample rate? Can't get this to play as good as your previous
> > posts....
> >
> > Martyn
> > *************************************
> > Martyn Stewart
> > www.naturesound.org
> > www.soundofcritters.com
> >
> > Redmond WA
> > 425-898-0462
> >
> > 47.65420118705451
> > -121.98158740997314
> >
> > Make every garden a wildlife habitat
> > **************************************
> > Listen to the Birds and the Bees at
> > http://naturesound.libsyn.org/
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > View a Nature Recordists Blog!
> >
> > http://naturesound.org/Blog/Blog.html
> >
> > http://naturesound.org/this_weeks_recordings/
> > this_weeks_recordings.html
> >
> > Follow me on AudioBoo
> > feed://audioboo.fm/users/31466/boos.atom
> >
> > Listen to my sounds on Facebook:
> > http://tinyurl.com/ye2dw7p
> >
> > P please consider the environment before printing this email
> >
> > On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:40 PM, kjcolver wrote:
> >
> > > Having left the recorder out all night in a breezy Aspen/Fir
> > woodland, I recorded the Flammulated Owl with a Great Horned Owl in
> > the distance. It was 2 AM. You can listen at www.7Loons.com or at
> > the "Soundscapes for Birders" free podcast at the iTunes Store.
> > >
> > > There is one call note that I haven't heard before on any
> > commercial bird sound guides. Does anyone recognize it as the Flam
> > Owl?
> > >
> > > Recorded with Sound Devices 722 and Sennheiser MKH 30/40 MS pair.
> > >
> > > Kevin Colver
> > >
> > > www.7Loons.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (3)
> 7a.
> Re: MOTU Traveler. Was "Mic arrays and M/S behaviour"
> Posted by: "Luiz do Carmo"  =C2=A0 lecarmo
> Thu Sep=C2=A02,=C2=A02010 5:50=C2=A0pm (PDT)
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm sure the specs for the M-Audio Fast Track Ultra are not
> atractive concerning
> its preamps.
>
> The Motu Traveler looks like a very nice peace of equipment, but I
> want my gear
> to be the lightest, most robust and simplest as possible. I believe
> that a
> combination of an audio interface with a laptop won't suit my plans.
>
> Luiz
>
> ________________________________
> From: Scott Fraser <>
> To: 
> Sent: Wed, September 1, 2010 11:21:55 AM
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: MOTU Traveler. Was "Mic arrays and
> M/S
> behaviour"
>
> <<I'=C3=A2=E2=80=9A=C2=AC=C3=A2=E2=80=9E=C2=A2ve also thought about a set=
up with an interface +
> laptop,=C3=A2=E2=80=9A=C2=AC=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=93
> mostly for the small issues regarding the DR-680 and the R-44=C3=A2=E2=80=
=9A=C2=AC=C3=A2
> =E2=82=AC=C5=93, but
> the noisy pres on the M-Audio Fast Track Ultra were not compelling.>>
>
> No personal experience but I've not heard anything favorable regarding
> any of the M-Audio interfaces. They have a poor reputation in pro
> circles.
>
> <<Then I heard here about the Motu Traveler-mk3, took a look at it and
> was impressed with the quality of the preamps, allegedly great, at
> least for the reviewers.>>
>
> Although I haven't done nature recording with the Traveler, I have
> recorded a fair share of music projects on location with it, from
> orchestras to string quartets to solo harpsichord, all for CD release.
> If budget were no issue the Traveler wouldn't be my first choice, but
> in its price range I've been quite favorably impressed with the
> transparency & available gain of its mic preamps. That, in addition to
> its full feature set (word clock i/o, AES i/o, SPDIF i/o, 2 x ADAT i/
> o, additional 4 line inputs, multiple powering options & the built in
> DSP,) & seamless integration with my DAW of choice (Digital
> Performer) have made it an easy choice. For film/video application
> (provided you're working from a cart rather than a shoulder-slung bag
> on the run,) you could run this with Boom Recorder & have full access
> to all the file metadata needed by post editors. The Traveler is also
> the only portable unit I own whose headphone output can actually get
> louder than I need it to be.
>
> Scott Fraser
>
>
>
> Back to top
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (2)
>
> RECENT ACTIVITY
>               3
> New Members
> Visit Your Group
> Y! Messenger
> All together now
> Host a free online
> conference on IM.

  ----------

>
> Ads on Yahoo!
> Learn more now.
> Reach customers
> searching for you.

  ----------

>
> Group Charity
> Hands On Network
> Volunteering has
> never been so easy

  ----------

>
> Need to Reply?
> Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in
> the Daily Digest.
> Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web
> Messages | Files | Photos | Database | Members
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
> MARKETPLACE
> Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're
> on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

  ----------

>
>
> Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions!
> Explore new interests.

  ----------

>
>
> Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers
> Center.

  ----------

>

  ----------

>
> Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch
> format to Traditional
> Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

  ----------

>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Digest Number 4799, Fred Israel <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU