1. Re: ORTF Recommendations

Subject:	1. Re: ORTF Recommendations
From:	"E_Karel" lerake
Date:	Wed Sep 1, 2010 10:53 am ((PDT))

--- In  "myles.thompson" <> wro=
te:
>
>
> The outdoor set looks interesting  - but it's considerably more expensive=
.

Yes, but it includes the suspension, ConnBox, and wind protection, which yo=
u'll need outside.  With the MSTC, you're limited to the separate small bas=
kets on each mic, which doesn't offer nearly the wind protection of a full =
zeppelin.  So including this cost, it's not actually much more expensive.

>
> --- In  "E_Karel" <ekarel@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Schoeps in ORTF is fantastic.  But for outdoor work, rather than the MS=
TC 64 U, they now offer this combination using the compact series, which lo=
oks perfect:
> >
> > http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/ortf-stereo-outdoor
> >
> > _Ernst
> >
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
1. Re: ORTF Recommendations, E_Karel <= 1. Re: ORTF Recommendations, myles.thompson

Previous by Date:	Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Kevin
Next by Date:	Rode ntg3 on the field, anyone?, lamacchiacosta
Previous by Thread:	Re: MOTU Traveler. Was "Mic arrays and M/S behaviour", Scott Fraser
Next by Thread:	1. Re: ORTF Recommendations, myles.thompson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU