Subject: | 2. Re: M/S recording setup |
---|---|
From: | "James Shatto" wwwshadow7 |
Date: | Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:42 pm ((PDT)) |
Not that I want to belabor it anymore.=A0 But in my test, the source was sy= nthetically engineered to match both gain and phase.=A0 So any degradation = / loss of resolution is entirely in the EDIT of the files.=A0 At a minimum = +M and -M should completely zero each other out.=A0 And be the equivalent o= f a null audio file.=A0 As should +S and -S.=A0 Not that=A0 -M or -S was re= corded.=A0 So just getting there is an edit of a digital file.=A0 Which I g= uess would be +1 for matrixing in the field.=A0 -S achieved in analog (infi= nite bitrate)?=A0 As long as you don't want or need to adjust the width (S)= in post. - James --- On Tue, 8/24/10, Scott Fraser <> wrote: |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: M/S recording setup, Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Re: M/S recording setup, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: M/S recording setup, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 3. Re: M/S recording setup, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU