4. Re: M/S recording setup

Subject:	4. Re: M/S recording setup
From:	"Max" oatcruncher
Date:	Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:48 am ((PDT))


--- In  "myles.thompson" <> wro=
te:
The reason I got the mixer was that someone on a forum explained that the p=
re-amps on the Fostex weren't particularly great - and a mixer with quiet w=
ould really help.

One thing to insert here Myles, is that the info you gathered from whicheve=
r forum it was, was not correct. If you do a check on the FR2-LE on THIS fo=
rum, you will quickly find that this recorder is highly rated in terms of s=
ound quality, if not quite the same in terms of construction.
Max

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
4. Re: M/S recording setup, Max <= 4. Re: M/S recording setup, Max 4. Re: M/S recording setup, Paul Jacobson

Previous by Date:	3. Re: M/S recording setup, Rob Danielson
Next by Date:	5. Re: M/S recording setup, Marcus Buick
Previous by Thread:	3. Re: M/S recording setup, Rob Danielson
Next by Thread:	4. Re: M/S recording setup, Max
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU