omichalis
Date: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:37 am ((PDT))
yep !
it was the second one ! though the first is fine also !
*note that that link
https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/audio-reports/RecorderList/RecorderLis=
t.htmand doesn' t work
though...
Quoting Tom Williams <>:
> Or possibly this one (recorders)
> https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/audio-reports/RecorderList/RecorderL=
ist.htmand
> this one (microphones)
> https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/audio-reports/MicSpecCharts/
>
> Tom
>
> On 19 June 2010 14:07, Philip Tyler <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Is it this one?
>>
>> http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: " <marinos%40agxivatein.com>" <
>> <marinos%40agxivatein.com>>
>> To: <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com=
>
>> Sent: Sat, 19 June, 2010 13:12:50
>> Subject: [Nature Recordists] recorders/mics noise level
>>
>>
>> hello all !
>>
>> I recall an excel file somewhere online
>> with measurements on the noise level of most available recorders and
>> pro microphones..
>>
>> would sb fwd me a link ??
>>
>> thx !
>>
>> m
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
|