naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re : [Nature Recordists] Recording hints

Subject: Re : [Nature Recordists] Recording hints
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:35 am ((PDT))
Hi Thomas--
You're welcome. "Hot" can take-over the brain.
I'll have to look at where you are located.

A FAQ is long overdue. I've started making a
community FAQ document that I'll soon post a link
to that list users can make additions to. Rob D.

  =3D =3D =3D =3D

At 3:26 PM +0000 6/16/10, Bocianowski Thomas wrote:
>Hi Rob,
>
>Thanks a lot for the clear explanation. That
>will make my life easier, as for now the
>situation is resumed to live with the internal
>mics (at the right gain level) or eventually
>later purchase better external mic with low self
>noise :o)
>
>I wonder if it would be possible to gather such
>advices in a FAQ but maybe it is already
>existing somewhere.
>
>Best regards from the Sultanate of Oman (Boiling hot)
>
>Thomas
>
>________________________________
>De : Rob Danielson <<type%40uwm.edu>>
>=C3=80 :
><naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>=
m
>Envoy=C3=A9 le : Mer 16 juin 2010, 0h 25min 58s
>Objet : Re: [Nature Recordists] Recording hints
>
>At 6:17 PM +0000 6/15/10, Bocianowski Thomas wrote:
>>  Hi All,
>>
>>I have recently started to record sounds around, first using a voice
>>recorder, then I decided my self for a Marantz PMD 620.
>>By now I am recording at a lower level of gain to limit the unwanted nois=
e.
>>
>>In fact if possible I'd like to have some advice on how to record
>>properly, I searched the archive but couldnt find resources on that
>>particular recorder, but I guess there are general rules that could
>>apply.
>>
>>Shall I use only PCM or MP3 can be sufficient ?
>>Is there any particular software that can help in removing
>>hiss/unwanted noise ?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Thomas
>
>=3D =3D =3D =3D
>
>Hi Thomas.
>
>Thanks for scanning the archives first!
>
>Even though it has a profound impact on "quality," I didn't fully
>understand the sources of noise in recordings for many years. Its not
>a particularly complex phenomenon-- just not what it first seems to
>be.
>
>In the great majority of instances, the source of noise one hears in
>recordings is the "self-noise" of the microphones used. When you
>increase the record gain in the recorder, it seems like this
>adjustment is adding hiss or noise, but its really just the signal
>from the microphones being amplified and becoming more audible along
>with the audio signal subject matter.
>
>The ratio of the mic "self-noise" to the audio signal is pretty much
>a constant. If you use a lot of gain the combined self-noise and
>audio signal has more "level" or "saturation" on the recording
>medium. If you use a small amount of gain, the combined self-noise
>and audio signal has little "level" or "saturation" on the recording
>medium. To hear the high level recording at a comfortable level, you
>might have to turn the playback volume down. Conversely, to hear the
>2nd recording at a comfortable level, you might have to turn the
>playback volume up. As long as you don't turn the record level in
>the field so high that the audio signal overloads the record circuit
>and distorts, the amount of hiss or noise in the audio played back in
>both recordings will be very close to the same. There are two more
>common exceptions. The mic preamplifier circuits in lower cost
>recorders can add some more noise at the highest settings and if the
>signal is recorded at a very very low level, there can be additional
>quantizing noise. A good rule of thumb is to set the record level so
>that the "peaks" of the bird calls, music, voice, etc. extend into
>the range between -25 and -12 dB on the record scale. Feel free to
>use whatever record gain is necessary to achieve this level without
>significant quality loss. There are other caveats, but these
>principles are good one's to "lock-in to one's memory" before
>exploring them and becoming confused again.
>
>As far as tricks to achieve very low noise recordings, none are as a
>effective as using mics with very low self-noise. As a guide, the
>built-in mics in your PMD 620 probably have self-noise in the range
>of 25dB(A) to 32dB(A). Mics that folks use to reduce noise to the
>lowest levels have about 1/4 to 1/6 as much noise with self-noise
>ratings in the 5-10 dB(A) range. As a result, one has no trouble
>finding posts in the archive with the terms, "low self-noise mic
>cost" in common. ;-) Rob D.
>
>--
>
>
>


--









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU