naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

6. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size

Subject: 6. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size
From: "simmosonics" simmosonics
Date: Thu May 20, 2010 1:43 am ((PDT))
--- In  Scott Fraser <> wr=
ote:

> This is a common misconception. Current Sample Rate Conversion
> technique does not directly divide higher rates to the target rate,
> i.e. 88.2k to 44.1k is not a case of simply dividing by two.

Right. There is no advantage in retaining an integer relation between sampl=
ing rates. At the core of this is the Nyquist frequency. A recording at 44.=
1ks/s ('ks/s' =3D kilo samples per second, to make a distinction from 'kHz'=
 for the audio signal) cannot contain audio signals above 22.05kHz (the Nyq=
uist frequency for 44.1ks/s), or it will cause aliasing. A recording made a=
t 88.2ks/s will contain audio signals up to 44.1kHz, so the sample rate con=
version process MUST include a low pass filter to remove everything above 2=
Message: 2.
Subject: 05kHz *before* converting to 44.1ks/s to prevent aliasing. The 
mathematic=
al process of filtering negates any theoretical benefits that an integer-re=
lated multiple sampling rate might have had.

Upsampling is a very common technique these days for many kinds of processi=
ng, including the filtering mentioned above. As I understand it [and correc=
t me if I'm wrong], it produces a cleaner result because it distributes the=
 error noise through a wider bandwidth, therefore less error noise within t=
he bandwidth that we're interested in (nominally 20Hz to 20kHz). I have use=
d plug-ins from Universal Audio and similar that rely on a DSP card and off=
er upsampling to 384ks/s. When the upsampling is switched in, the sound bec=
omes noticeably smoother and cleaner when monitored through mastering quali=
ty converters, amps and speakers (Grace, Bel Canto, ATC). I am not sure if =
the differences would be apparent through every day sound systems, but it's=
 all cumulative... if you have *enough* of that error noise, due to repeate=
d processing and so on, it will probably become noticeable through very ord=
inary playback systems.

FWIW, I do all of my recording at 96k 24-bit, and use iZotope's SRC and MBI=
T+ dither to downsample and reduce word size as necessary. No problems... Y=
ou can see how the iZotope SRC compares against others here:

http://src.infinitewave.ca/

And you can get it for $79 US in Sample Manager (from Audiofile Engineering=
), along with MBIT+ dither and a whole heap of other useful file processing=
 tools. You can get that here:

http://www.audiofile-engineering.com/samplemanager/

- Greg Simmons







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 6. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, simmosonics <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU