Subject: | Re: Red-winged dawn |
---|---|
From: | "Aaron Ximm" aaron_gmail |
Date: | Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:15 pm ((PDT)) |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Bernie Krause <> wrote: > Your argument is supported, Jeremiah. Biophony speaks only to > biological, non-human sources of sound in a given habitat. Geophony is > comprised of all other natural non-biological sound sources emanating > from a habitat. Anthrophony is made up of human-generated sound. Say, Bernie, Has much survey been done on the non-animal biophany? E.g. plant-sounds? Mycophony? I can think of the example of David Dunn's recordings of vascular systems, but that's it... Hmmm... Mycophone. Good project name. Dibs! :) aaron -- quietamerican.org oneminutevacation.org 83% happy 9% disgusted 6% fearful 2% angry |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Red-winged dawn, Bernie Krause |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Red-winged dawn, Bernie Krause |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Red-winged dawn, Bernie Krause |
Next by Thread: | Re: Red-winged dawn, Bernie Krause |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU