naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sonority and tonality

Subject: Re: sonority and tonality
From: "ffs" brainsci001
Date: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:56 pm ((PDT))
Hello Aliza

I am very rusty in acoustic phonetics so verify this - but I believe that i=
f you are referring to the technical use of the term sonorous as in 'sonori=
ty' then I believe 'low' vowels are greater/higher in sonority than 'high' =
vowels. And 'high' vowels will be perceived as lower in pitch than 'low' vo=
wels (when fundamental frequency is held constant). So with everything else=
 being equal, that is correct- but but they rarely are- and the other facto=
rs influencing perception of pitch will always come into play functionally.
I am not sure what you mean by 'more harmonic'.

paul




--- In  "alizaleroux" <> wr=
ote:
>
> As person who's been studying animal vocalizations far more than human vo=
calizations, I am a little unclear about some aspects of human sounds.
>
> I was wondering if more sonorous vowels can also be described as more har=
monic and higher pitched? Or is this too simplistic a description?
>
> Thank you for your help!
> Aliza
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU