Subject: | Down sizing parallel boundary arrays? |
---|---|
From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
Date: | Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:44 pm ((PDT)) |
Hi all, I'm wondering if there was any limit to how far the barriers could be reduced before they ceased to be effective? It seems the forward edge setback requirement is minimal - around 0.5 to 1.5 inches. The length of the barrier behind the capsule seems to be designed to function primarily as a mount for the mic. I wonder if this rear offset could be reduced to 1.5 to 2 inches without effecting the rig performance? The same question extends to the height of the barrier. Could this dimension be reduced without negative effect? cheers Paul |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Congress to vote Monday on end-run around Grand Canyon noise control, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Down sizing parallel boundary arrays?, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Congress to vote Monday on end-run around Grand Canyon noise control, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Down sizing parallel boundary arrays?, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU