naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

2. Re: FR-2LE & AT4022

Subject: 2. Re: FR-2LE & AT4022
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:25 am ((PDT))
At 12:50 PM +0000 3/15/10, Robin wrote:
>
>Paul Jacobson wrote:
>
>>  There were definitely differences in the
>>  way the two recorders were set up
>
>Coming in late to this thread I would like to thank you both for the
>time taken to produce this intriguing comparison. And everyone else
>for great commentary.
>
>Listening to the recordings without knowing which was which, I was
>surprised to find that I definitively preferred your parallel
>boundary AT3032 setup. A significant factor was the "noise" present
>in Andrew's recording, as already noted.

Robin--
I'm curious about this noise you guys are referring to. Can you
describe it further? Do you think it could be really high in pitch,
like over 10K Hz?  The rigs were near Andrew's house and there could
be acoustic HF noise bands that the mic could pick-up differently.
Is it more noticeable in the last video test with only background
excerpts?  Rob D.

>
>-- robin
>


--







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 2. Re: FR-2LE & AT4022, Rob Danielson <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU