| Subject: | 8. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robin" escalation746 |
| Date: | Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:30 pm ((PST)) |
Chris Edwards wrote: > Hmmm - but I thought the D50 was cardioid and the M10 was omni. Yes, that's true, which is why the D50 has the noisier mics, which poorer f= requency response as well. -- robin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 9. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, oryoki2000 |
| Previous by Thread: | [Nature Recordists] Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | 8. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Michael Raphael |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU