naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Audio Monitors for Editing

Subject: Re: Audio Monitors for Editing
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:41 am ((PDT))
At 6:51 AM -0700 8/27/09, Scott Fraser wrote:
>
>
><<> We usually avoid any active speakers. A speaker cabinet is just
>about
>>  the worst place for an amplifier. Certain electrical components (like
>>  larger caps and certain types of resistors) can be quite sensitive to
>>  magnetic fields and then ... the whole cabinet is vibrating of sound.
>>  And most electrical components (from IC:s to caps) have a physical
>>  construction that make them quite sensitive to this.>
>
><Five years later, does this still hold true please?>>
>
>Still? I'd say every single notion posited above is highly debatable
>if not outright bunk.
>
>Scott Fraser
>

Going with a $150 pair of powered speakers for Max's application
makes sense to me. He might want to give a little thought to the
material he plans to work with-- particularly if any semi-serious
mixing is planned. The inexpensive "reference" monitors of today do
seem a lot better than the "book shelf" options of yesteryear, but
they can still have a tough time conveying extremely high and low
frequency sounds-- insects and thunder being a couple of common
examples.  Max, if you can describe the material you plan to work
with,  I bet some nature recordists can recommend particular speakers
in your price range that they've been happy with. Rob D.

--







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU