Subject: | 4. Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:00 am ((PDT)) |
> Depending on the specific recording situation, I would say that the > preamp noise is often not that important. Personally, I wouldn't > care much about an increase of the overall self-noise level of lets > say 1 or 2 dB that might be caused by the poor preamplifier. I would > just accept this minor disadvantage for the small size and weight of > a particular recorder. For instance, I'm quite happy with the rugged > TASCAM DR-1 (-115dBu on MIN IN 2) in combination with the K6/ME66 > for recording individual animals. Yes, as long as a mic has a "hot" output (higher in mV or smaller negative dB number (like -30), it can get well over the input noise of a nothing-special preamp. This was one of the joys of the discovery of the Shure 183 with MD recorders. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 5. Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 5. Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU