naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise reduced

Subject: Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise reduced
From: "Jim Morgan" fundador_four
Date: Fri May 29, 2009 3:03 pm ((PDT))
Here is an example of a noisy unedited recording vs the same recording edited 
with filtering and noise reduction. Listening to the edited portion through 
headphones sounds good to my ears but my hearing is poor and I would like to 
know how it sounds to others with good hearing.

Thanks for any comments,

Jim Morgan
Prescott Arizona


http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/0EwgSuYkUSCYVitt-0vLqxwDaFNCnn_dhjH5GIf3OtR5vQ8pVyVpSGLGlzxVk00tWinq4zdgKPIU95JyUUe2Yfm4iGpWGEQKyCVJgg/1567Phainopep_NR_File_T_%20Alamos%20raw_filt.mp3









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise reduced, Jim Morgan <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU