Subject: | Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise reduced |
---|---|
From: | "Jim Morgan" fundador_four |
Date: | Fri May 29, 2009 3:03 pm ((PDT)) |
Here is an example of a noisy unedited recording vs the same recording edited with filtering and noise reduction. Listening to the edited portion through headphones sounds good to my ears but my hearing is poor and I would like to know how it sounds to others with good hearing. Thanks for any comments, Jim Morgan Prescott Arizona http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/0EwgSuYkUSCYVitt-0vLqxwDaFNCnn_dhjH5GIf3OtR5vQ8pVyVpSGLGlzxVk00tWinq4zdgKPIU95JyUUe2Yfm4iGpWGEQKyCVJgg/1567Phainopep_NR_File_T_%20Alamos%20raw_filt.mp3 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: quiet shotgun mic, escalation746 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fw: [Naturerecording] Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise redu, Jim Morgan |
Previous by Thread: | "Rycote" fabric?, David Kuhn |
Next by Thread: | Fw: [Naturerecording] Raw noisy recording vs filtered and noise redu, Jim Morgan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU