| Subject: | 1. Re: 722 vs MixPre |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
| Date: | Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:49 am ((PDT)) |
--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > Thanks for doing a re-test, Curt. There proved to be some good > lessons in it so I've uploaded the test as a QuickTime movie: > > http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/pages/Olson_11dB_Mics_Pre= Testing-present.html > > or > http://snipurl.com/ehf84 > > Scroll down for my analysis. Rob D. > Hi Rob, Thanks for posting this test. I think that it should now be accepted that the FR-2LE's and the majority o= f similar recorders such as the TASCAM HD-P2 or Marantz PMD661 usually don'= t require any external preamplifiers and also no esoteric upgrades in order= to improve their "clarity" or "detail for enhanced performance". Regards, Raimund |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1. Re: Equalized Monitoring (was Speakers for Editing, Dan Dugan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2. Re: 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | 1. Re: 722 vs MixPre, Scott Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU