naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nature Recordists] FIRST STEPS.

To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] FIRST STEPS.
From: Rob Danielson <>




Hi Hagai Loyewski--

Do you want a very inexpensive "beginners system" primarily for
recording birds or a more expensive system for better recordings and
more subjects? It helps us to learn more about your interests and
budget. Rob D.

At 4:52 AM -0700 3/10/09, hagai loyewski wrote:
>what would be the essential basic equipment for nature recording?
>
>
>--- On Wed, 4/3/09, oryoki2000
><<oryoki% 40gmail.com> com> wrote:
>
>From: oryoki2000 <<oryoki% 40gmail.com> com>
>Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: FIRST STEPS.
>To:
><naturereco rdists%40yahoogr oups.com>naturerecordists@ yahoogroups=
. com
>Received: Wednesday, 4 March, 2009, 1:24 AM
>
>hagai loyewski wrote:
>
>> i've got a "uni-directional mic DM-20SL2 - IMP.600
>
>I'm not certain, but I think the microphone is made
>
>by Wharfedale. The DM stands for "Dynamic Microphone."
>
>The IMP.600 means "600 ohm impedance." The S may mean
>
>that the mic has an on/off switch.
>
>Taking the leap of faith that Wharfedale is the
>
>manufacturer. ..
>
>The Wharfedale DM2.0 microphone is designed for use in a loud
>
>environment where you want to reject the sounds coming from everywhere
>
>except directly in front of the mic. So it would be a good choice for
>
>a loud instrument like a drum, for a singer in a band, or perhaps for
>
>a DJ at a nightclub. It might work well for someone who needs to
>
>address a crowd while reducing the chance of feedback from the PA system.
>
>These mic characteristics are generally not what you'd want if you're
>
>interested in nature recording. A mic that is more sensitive and that
>
>captures a wide field would be more useful. A mic like the Wharfedale
>
>DM2.0 might be very useful in situations where the mic could be placed
>
>very close to a relatively loud subject, like a woodpecker rapping on
>
>a tree trunk.
>
>For recording bird song, most people here recommend recording in
>
>stereo so the context of the bird's singing is captured. The result
>
>is a more natural sounding recording.
>
>--oryoki
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox.
>Take a look
><http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x>http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ =
mail/smarterinbo x
>
>
>
>

--


















      Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. T=
ake a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Nature Recordists] FIRST STEPS., Rob Danielson <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU