John Hartog wrote:
> Perhaps for listening purposes alone. However, for observing,
> documenting, and studying an animal within its surroundings, spacial
> information provided by stereo might be desired. If in addition an
> on-axis species recording is needed, it should not matter if the
> subject is not centered between the speakers.
>
> In your initial responses you suggested stereo recording for
> scientific work was not feasible. I am just pointing out it is
> perfectly feasible, and not all that complicated.
>
> Multi-channel surround recordings also hold their place in scientific
> analysis when the extra steps can be justified to solve front to back
> folding issues inherent to stereo.
>
> You have made it clear that mono is standard for the type of work you
> are involved with. I hear nothing wrong in your mono examples on your
> website, you do very fine work -- your efforts are commendable.
> Furthermore you are a very much appreciated resource to the nature
> sound recording community. Thank you for all that.
>
>
> John Hartog
>
Hello John,
Thanks for your kind words.
I believe that we should leave it to the researchers themselves
whether they should use stereo or not. They probably do not need our
instructions.
Regards,
Raimund
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|