naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

[Nature Recordists] Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbo=

To:
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbo=
From: Curt Olson <>
n calls

Bernie, would you be willing to elaborate on this?

We know about differing frequency response characteristics. Skull
structure, outer ear size, shape and placement will all certainly have
their effect. So will brain power, channeled by inbred priorities and
experience.

What other factors would you point out?

Curt Olson

Bernie Krause wrote:

> ...and don't forget that critters hear and process sound very
> differently than we do.
>
> Bernie
>
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Marc Myers wrote:
>
>> The area depends on how far the calls can be heard. If one can say
>> that the farthest call was at 300 meters, One has to say that's the
>> limit. Topography, of course, effects everything but my guess is
>> human ears will be more reliable than technology in terms of
>> distinguishing the primary sources.


------------------------------------

"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
Yahoo! Groups Links










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Nature Recordists] Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbo=, Curt Olson <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU