Subject: | Re: field playback |
---|---|
From: | "Max Catterwell" oatcruncher |
Date: | Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:35 am ((PDT)) |
I for one hope this is not going to be encouraged. Our wild friends are suffering enough interference already I believe. And for those who say 'it doesn't do any harm', are we sure? My opinion. Max Roger.Norwood wrote: > So who uses digital recorders to replay responses in the field and which > machine has the 'best' loudest built-in loudspeaker? > I have a MARANTZ 660. Is there anything with better/louder full range > reproduction? > I am looking for real high quality portable playback. > cheers > Roger > > > > ------------------------------------ > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | field playback, Roger.Norwood |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: field playback, Martyn Stewart |
Previous by Thread: | field playback, Roger.Norwood |
Next by Thread: | Re: field playback, Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU