naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Re: Reference question

Subject: 5. Re: Reference question
From: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:53 pm ((PDT))
A clear distinction w/o a difference, John. A rose is still a rose,
by any other name. Actually, if I had my druthers, I'd call it a
moose with lipstick.

Bernie

On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:39 PM, John Hartog wrote:

> --- In  Bernie Krause <>
> wrote:
>
> > Let's say we have 10 recordists at a site recording the same thing
> > for the same period of time. Each one uses one favorite technique.
> > Represented are systems that include XY, SASS, ORTF, mono, MS, an
> > Aachen head (one of the most elaborate and expensive binaural
> systems
> > there is), Telinga stereo, Blumlein, OSS, N.O.S., etc. In the end,
> > which recorded result is "realistic?" More accurately, isn't the
> > result, then -- given that any one recording is a mere abstraction
> > from the complex whole -- more of an "impression?"
>
> I think this is called "perspective." Each technique has potential to
> reveal a meaningful perspective and a realistic impression of the
> setting.
>
> John Hartog
>
>
>

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU