Subject: | 7. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Wed Jul 9, 2008 12:09 am ((PDT)) |
Vicki Powys wrote: > I then compared Low 10 at 24 bit and 16 bit settings but could not > really detect any big difference in noise levels for the 2 settings. Vicky, Okay, this means that the inherent noise floor of the K6/ME67 (measured in dBu) is still high enough compared to the quantization noise floor at 16 bit. Though, based on my measurements, I would think that one could detect differences between 16 and 24 bit at the low sense setting in conjunction with a less sensitive microphone. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 6. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Rob/Curt rig tried out, John Hartog |
Previous by Thread: | 7. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 8. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU