| Subject: | Re: Parabolic Reflector plus Head Spaced Boundary - Field Test |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Sun Mar 2, 2008 9:38 am ((PST)) |
Would not the head and parabola innately have wider imaging, less focus? If you used a point source mic I'll bet you will find a great difference in aiming ability. Isn't it the nature of the beast?!? Probably not so much beginner status as the type of mice you are using. <L> On Mar 2, 2008, at 9:30 AM, tk7859 wrote: > I managed to get out for a total of some eight hours of field testing > the PRHSB. I behaved exactly as predicted by the tests in my garden > at home. However I found it quite difficult to aim at and isolate > individual sounds in the thickish woodland. I'm clearly very much a > beginner to using a dish in this type of habitat. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Parabolic Reflector plus Head Spaced Boundary - Field Test, tk7859 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Parabolic Reflector plus Head Spaced Boundary - Field Te, tk7859 |
| Previous by Thread: | Parabolic Reflector plus Head Spaced Boundary - Field Test, tk7859 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Parabolic Reflector plus Head Spaced Boundary - Field Test, Nicolas Selosse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU