naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Architecture

Subject: Architecture

Bernie
















On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Andy Wilson wrote:

> Bernie Krause wrote:
>> We've broken that down into three components: (1) the biophony,
>> meaning all of the sounds emanating from biological sources in a
>> given biome =96 marine or terrestrial. (2) the geophony, non-biological
>> sources of sound coming from (mostly) undisturbed habitats, and (3)
>> the anthrophony, comprised of human-induced sound from whatever
>> source.
>
> these seem to me to be powerful distinctions, the problems only
> arise if
> they are taken to be in any way definitive or exhaustive. there are
> many
> ways one might divide up the sonic universe depending on your
> intellectual, moral or scientific focus.
>
> many people on this list seem to have as their ideal 'pristine
> recordings of the calls and cries of animals' (because of the focus on
> pristine quality, i lurk on this list mostly for the technical
> information :-)
>
> some people i know are interested in the sounds of an idealised
> 'nature'
> which is supposed to be interesting because it is uncivilised. i find
> that interest a bit dull because of the way it fetishises the
> distinction between man and nature.
>
> others are interested in the musical qualities of unintentionally
> musical events (much phonography seems to have this focus).
> interestingly, the focus here is as much on the perceiving mind that
> hears a sound rather than the sound itself (it's perhaps a very
> Cageian
> approach).
>
> others may be interested in 'soundscapes' as such, whether human,
> 'natural' or mixed. they may be interested in the soundscape for
> musical
> reasons (they find interesting musical qualities), for scientific
> reasons (they are interested in the impact of the soundscape on either
> human or natural / animal behaviour), or for historical reasons (for
> what soundscapes and our relation to them reveals about historical
> sensibilities)
>
> whatever the motivation or goal, these are all interesting and useful
> ways of dividing up sonic experience.
>
> my own interest is a particular kind of stochastic, chaotic sound,
> whatever the source. so i may make use of many different kinds of
> source
> materials without preference. i have great recordings of the sea at
> Chesil beach rolling the pebbles there around in ways that sound
> interesting to me. i might be equally interested in the sound of a
> group
> of frogs or a group of children calling together, for similar reasons.
> my compositions often use the sounds of things being agitated in
> various
> ways (stones falling in unison, tin foil being crushed, etc., etc -
> ie.
> sources treated from the point of view of musique concrete.)
>
> on holiday in Norway recently i made hours of recordings but my
> favourite was one of a field full of sheep all with bells ringng,
> bleating together while a kind of 'field of bells' sounded around
> them.
> the sound is produced by sheep, not humans, but it is produced by the
> sounding of a human device (the bell), yet the sound i am
> interested in
> is that of the mass of bells, not any particular bell or the pattern
> produced by an individual sheep. it is not the sound of humans, not
> the
> sound of nature - just interesting because of the physical
> properties of
> the situation (bells being sounded at 'random' in a wide stereo
> space).
>
> the fact that there aren't hard and fast boundaries in principle
> between
> these different centres of interest, doesn't however mean that the
> various mailing lists don't have fairly well defined focuses - it just
> means that these focii aren't established on first principles, but
> emerge informally out of the economic, philosophic, scientific, etc.,
> interests that unite the participants.
>
> --
> Everybody gives lip service to the idea that people are
> the most important part of a software project, but nobody
> is quite sure what you can *do* about it.
>
> [][][] Andy Wilson        | Mob: +44 (0)7739 908 253
>    [][] Managing Director  | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
> []  [] LShift Ltd         | Web: http://www.lshift.net
>
>
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

Google Earth zooms: Earth.WildSanctuary.com










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Architecture, Unknown <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU