naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

9. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings

Subject: 9. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings
From: "Raimund Specht" animalsounds
Date: Wed May 23, 2007 3:19 am ((PDT))
Thanks to all for the emotional support...

Dan Dugan wrote:
> Always dither any reduction in bit depth. Better safe than grainy!

Yes, I would agree on that because the dither will probably never
hurt. But don't expect to improve the quality of the final 16 bit
version of a typical nature recording.

Regards,
Raimund





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 9. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Raimund Specht <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU