| Subject: | 9. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
| Date: | Wed May 23, 2007 3:19 am ((PDT)) |
Thanks to all for the emotional support... Dan Dugan wrote: > Always dither any reduction in bit depth. Better safe than grainy! Yes, I would agree on that because the dither will probably never hurt. But don't expect to improve the quality of the final 16 bit version of a typical nature recording. Regards, Raimund |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 8. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, david briggs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 10. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Klas Strandberg |
| Previous by Thread: | 8. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, david briggs |
| Next by Thread: | 10. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Klas Strandberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU