| Subject: | 5. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
|---|---|
| From: | "Steve Pelikan" pelikan45224 |
| Date: | Tue May 22, 2007 4:31 pm ((PDT)) |
Friends: > yes its just Walter being pedantic and awkward as usual... > chill out Walt A bit of an over-reaction. We all scan emails/postings pretty fast and fire of our impressions, which probably accounts for any mis-interpretation of Raimund's post. Walt (and most others) are didactic (meaning "teaching" / aka. pedantic) because they know a lot and are expressing considered opinions. That's why I read this group: people with more experience than I offer their opinions. That's something I value. Not that I don't take _everyone's_ comments with a grain of salt. Cheers! Steve P |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 4. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, david briggs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 6. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Marc Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, david briggs |
| Next by Thread: | 6. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Marc Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU