12. Re: Phantom power noise

naturerecordists

12. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!

Subject:	12. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!
From:	"Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date:	Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:34 pm ((PDT))

Klas, you wrote,

>That the signal is on pin 3, instead of pin 2, is only a matter of
>taste, really.

It used to be that way, but now there is an AES standard. Pin 2 is
hot or in-phase. Now if this particular mic puts out an inverted
signal, voltage going in the opposite direction from sound pressure,
then driving pin 3 would make sense.

-Dan Dugan

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
12. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Dan Dugan <=

Previous by Date:	11. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Raimund Specht
Next by Date:	13. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg
Previous by Thread:	11. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Raimund Specht
Next by Thread:	13. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU