Subject: | 5. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!! |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:58 am ((PDT)) |
> The two signal leads (2,3) must "see" the same impedance, otherwise > the input will not outbalance disturbances in the cable. Pin 3 must > therefore be grounded via a resistor and a capacitor simulating the > same impedance as the signal output. Yes, that impedance matching will make sure that the disturbances entering in the cable will be compensated. However, in this way, the noise originating from the phantom power will only be present on pin Message: 2. Subject: Pin 3 would be absolutely silent, regardless of the phantom power noise. This imbalance could be fixed for instance by adding a second dummy output stage that is similiar to the active output stage. > If there was some internal oscillation in the PRO6, which could be > outbalanced, I would have seen that on the scope. I don't meant internal oscillations. The problem could just be the noise that originates from the recorder's phantom power supply circuit. Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 4. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 6. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Raimund Specht |
Previous by Thread: | 5. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | 5. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU