| Subject: | Re: ME-62 vs AT3032 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Steve Pelikan" pelikan45224 |
| Date: | Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:06 am ((PDT)) |
My reaction was about the same, but I attributed it partly to the fact that I use an ME62 a lot and so am very accustomed to its sound. It seems there's difference in power in the two track, does that mean the ME62 is a little more sensitive (high output for fixed input)? And yes, thank you Rich. I too find this sort of comparison interesting. Steve P |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: just one more MD question (waxing philosophical), Roger Norwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ME-62 vs AT3032, Rich Peet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ME-62 vs AT3032, Rich Peet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME-62 vs AT3032, Rich Peet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU