Subject: | Re: digital lossy, was: cheap minidiscs? |
---|---|
From: | "{ brad brace }" bbrace2001 |
Date: | Sun Mar 4, 2007 2:12 pm ((PST)) |
>From what I remember reading somewhere... when digitally copying (playing) a MD to another MD recorder, there is a loss of information. Or is my memory flawed as well? /:b On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Lou Judson wrote: > Digital copies do not degrade, unless the software or the user does > something to it. > > I've had friends who would copy CDs not realizing that their PCs would > make MP3s and then make CDs from them - that was degradation, and > contributes to copy degradation myths... > > And MD is probably the most robust digital storage around, due to the > magneto-optical recording process, according to some people I know. > > I have also found that even the cheaper MDs record just as well as > premium, though I have not done exbhaustive testing. Has anyone else > here? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: cheap minidiscs?, { brad brace } |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: digital lossy, was: cheap minidiscs?, stoatwizard |
Previous by Thread: | (OFF TOPIC) Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a, Jim Morgan |
Next by Thread: | Re: digital lossy, was: cheap minidiscs?, stoatwizard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU