naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: digital lossy, was: cheap minidiscs?

Subject: Re: digital lossy, was: cheap minidiscs?
From: "{ brad brace }" bbrace2001
Date: Sun Mar 4, 2007 2:12 pm ((PST))
>From what I remember reading somewhere... when digitally
copying (playing) a MD to another MD recorder, there is a
loss of information. Or is my memory flawed as well?  /:b

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Lou Judson wrote:

> Digital copies do not degrade, unless the software or the user does
> something to it.
>
> I've had friends who would copy CDs not realizing that their PCs would
> make MP3s and then make CDs from them - that was degradation, and
> contributes to copy degradation myths...
>
> And MD is probably the most robust digital storage around, due to the
> magneto-optical recording process, according to some people I know.
>
> I have also found that even the cheaper MDs record just as well as
> premium, though I have not done exbhaustive testing. Has anyone else
> here?




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU