Subject: | Re: Where the sound is better |
---|---|
From: | "Steve Pelikan" pelikan45224 |
Date: | Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:51 pm ((PST)) |
Rich, and friends: I understand the point of your question and agree with the perceptions, sentiment, and the concern behind it behind. But here's an example: In the last 10 years the county park system where I live bought an old agricultural field, crushed a lot of drainage tile, and made some scrapes with an earthmover. It fills with water every year. Before, there was nothing --- I was there in the early spring listening for snipe and woodcock. Now the frogs are deafening. On a nice spring night one can stand in the dark and listen to the peepers. You practically need hearing protection to bear it! http://homepages.uc.edu/~pelikas/Peepers-2002.mp3 Of course, it was like that every where around here at one point. Where I live, conservation and preservation aren't issues any more. Maybe the issue is restoration, but mostly we're fighting to protect restored areas. Best as always, Steve P |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Where the sound is better, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New York Times Nature Sound Article, Steve Pelikan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Where the sound is better, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | New York Times Nature Sound Article, Steve Pelikan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU