naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: My MZ-RH1 mic in: -122.8 dBu noise floor

Subject: Re: My MZ-RH1 mic in: -122.8 dBu noise floor
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob
Date: Wed Jan 3, 2007 12:15 am ((PST))
At 9:01 AM +0000 12/29/06, jpbeale wrote:
>--- In  "Raimund Specht"
><> wrote:
>>  I agree that the relatively high output impedance of 1 kohm results in
>>  a higher noise level. Though, I guess that a 150 ohm source might
>>  improve the noise figure by more than 2 dB.
>
>I redid the measurement with a different attenuator, with Z=3D150 ohms
>out this time; all the rest of the setup was the same. The total noise
>floor was improved by 1.6 dB. Some small noise spikes also appeared,
>eg. around 15 kHz. I am not sure if that is internal to the unit or
>not. I took down the setup, reassembled it, and re-ran the test. I got
>the same results again to within 0.1 dB.
>
>Measured MZ-RH1 input noise level (150 ohm source)
>
>-122.2 dBu (unweighted)
>-124.4 dbu (A weighted)
>
>http://beale.best.vwh.net/measure/audio/MZ-RH1_Mic_30_150Z.htm
>
>J. Beale Dec.28 2006
>


Hi J Beale--

Your input noise numbers seem better than Richard's for his NH700
http://www.wildlife-sound.org/equipment/himd/himdmyths_meas.html
and Bruce's for his NH800:
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-04/=
msg00301.html

In practical application, Richard concluded that the noise of the mic
pre in his Hi-MD recorder at gain "28"  is faintly detectable within
the signal created by a Sennheiser mkh-40 mic with 25mV/Pa and
self-noise of 12dBA.  In my experience with recorders, this is very
commendable performance for a low cost unit.

As you may have read, all of the Hi-MD models appear to have the same
mic pre AD circuit. I recall Richard mentioning his MZ-RH1 having
slightly more noise than his NH700 perhaps due to the different kind
of display in the MZ-RH1. A listening test comparing a MZ-RH1  to a
earlier model yielded no detectable difference by ear, but maybe they
are some performance differences in the units being produced.

In your ratings of the performance of your Hi-MD recorder,
http://beale.best.vwh.net/measure/audio/MZ-RH1_Mic_30_150Z.htm  to
which audio recorders are you making this comparison or "poor" and
"average?"  Rob D.





--
Rob Danielson
Peck School of the Arts
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU