Thanks for doing the tests.
I own three different generations of mkh-110's. They possess
different caps and different transistors. The mic is so old that I
suspect no one who wrote the specs checked out the upper freq limit.
I suspect but don't really know that the mkh-110 will outperform the
mkh-20 because it is so primative and without filters or balanced
output.
I am glad you know are the proud owner of a 100,000 cycle capable mic
you didn't own yesterday and paid nothing new for.
Also thanks Steve. Your info tells me that I likely gave MPR wrong
info when they played the bat on public radio. I indicated it was a
Little Brown Bat. I don't think I will bother with a change to it
being a little Big Brown Bat.
Rich
--- In Gianni Pavan <>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> after testing the mkh 110 I also tested a mkh 110-2, a model
for
> which I never found specifications. It appears to be more sensitive
> than the 110; by using the same piezo transducer used for the
> previous test I get good response up to 100 kHz. I suppose the high
> frequency sensitivity could be boosted by removing the frontal grid.
>
> I would be interested in knowing specifications of both models I
have
> and in getting feedback from other mkh 110 users.
>
> Gianni
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Gianni Pavan
> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
> Universita' degli Studi di Pavia
> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 PAVIA, ITALIA
> Tel +39-0382-987874
> Fax +39-02-700-32921
> Web http://www.unipv.it/cibra
> Email
>
|