Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722

Subject:	Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722
From:	"Matthieu Crocq" matthieucrocq
Date:	Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:28 am (PDT)

>  From: &quot;evs&quot; >
>  To: >
>  Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 3:07 AM
>
>  now, what speaks against recording all day onto an 4gb flash card or
>  microdrive, and at the end of a day you just backup everything into
>  an external 2,5&quot; firewire drive (or maybe on two, for backup
>  reasons), erase the flash card and record with it the next day again?
>  shure, the flash card and a 40gb external firewire drive will cost
>  maybe 200,- =80, but you still save 300,-=80 i guess in comparison to a
>  722...

And what about a "memory card to DVD" (or CD) standalone burner? It
may be able to do a double (ou triple) backup a the recording on
CD-R or DVD-R, and it seems that a burned DVD or CD is less prone
to problems (humidity, shocks) than an hard disk, am I wrong?
Have someone ever tested a device like the one of the Delkin
Burnaway, e.g.?
http://www.delkin.com/products/burnaway/

Best regards,
Matthieu

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722, Matthieu Crocq <=

Previous by Date:	Mystery Sound from North Central Florida, stancourtney
Next by Date:	Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Walter Knapp
Previous by Thread:	Mystery Sound from North Central Florida, stancourtney
Next by Thread:	Mystery Sound, Martyn Stewart
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU