I agree with Rich.
I'm now almost certain it isn't a Field Sparrow as I first guessed
(based on making a sonogram).
Rich Peet wrote:
> Thanks, much easier to divide the two birds now and does sound much
> more real even though noisier.
>
> I don't think I am going to be able to say for sure on this one even
> when you get a bunch of maybes from people. I can say it is not a
> bunch of things but not certain it is anything. Good test, I loose.
>
> Could be a finch, a bunting, a cardinal, or a sparrow.
>
> Rich
>
> --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>, "stancourtney"
> <> wrote:
> >
> > Rich,
> >
> > Here is the an unfiltered verssion:
> >
> >
> http://www.stancourtney.com/birdandanimalsounds/MysteryBird16_original
> <http://www.stancourtney.com/birdandanimalsounds/MysteryBird16_original>
> > .mp3
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stan Courtney
> >
> >
> > --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>, "Rich Peet" <richpeet@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't believe this.
> > > I believe part of what I am hearing includes wrap around distortion
> > > and another part is compression artifact distortion.
> > >
> > > It would help it you post one or two calls without the filtering you
> > > did. I am still perplexed as to what it is.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>, Steve Pelikan <pelikan@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Field Sparrow?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dont think so.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> >
>
>
|