| Subject: | Re: [ot] parabolic foley? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Jim Morgan" fundador_four |
| Date: | Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:23 pm (PDT) |
A parabola can work for this but keep in mind that the distant sounds you r= ecord will likely have a distant sound quality to them. I believe this is p= rimarily due to the attenuation of the higher frequency sounds caused by th= e distance. The porabola will compensate for this, to a degree, by amplifyi= ng the higher frequency sounds more that the lower frequency. In fact the l= ower frequency, if low enough won't be amplified by the parabola at all. So= it all depends on what you really want. You can get a clear recording of s= omething 200 feet away but it will have a distant quality that one 50 feet = will not have. If you are a wiz at sound editing you might be able to corre= ct this. Jim Jim Morgan Prescott, Arizona USA http://www.wingsofnature.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ot] parabolic foley?, Kim Cascone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Future of batteries?, J. Young |
| Previous by Thread: | [ot] parabolic foley?, Kim Cascone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ot] parabolic foley?, umashankar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU