Subject: | Re: Questions for audio gurus |
---|---|
From: | "werainey" <> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:54:50 -0000 |
> This is not completely true. Some devices running at 96 and 192 kHz > have sharp a-a filters at both frequencies, but others have good > filters at 96 kHz and very smooth (bad) filters at 192 kHz. In some > 192 kHz devices I also found a frequency response smoothly falling > above 40-50 kHz. > > Thus it is important to carefully test the devices before completely > trusting in their specifications. > > I'll try to publish some tests soon. Excellent! I'd certainly like to learn of consumer hardware that offers bot= h sharp antialiasing filters and reasonable frequency response at both those= sampling frequencies. Bill R. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | List now sorted by threads/date, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Questions for audio gurus, Rich Peet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Questions for audio gurus, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Questions for audio gurus, Rich Peet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU