| Subject: | Re: SD 722 frequency response and aliasing @ 192k |
|---|---|
| From: | |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:47:31 +0100 (MET) |
I just wrote: >So, I would agree with your initial suggestion >that the SD722 is good to at least 50kHz (at -10dB) I'm sorry, I meant -10dB at 96kHz. The attenuation at 50kHz is actually ver= y small (less than 1 dB). Raimund Specht -- Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen f=FCr GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SD722 frequency response and aliasing @ 192k, recordingbird |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Wild Sanctuary |
| Previous by Thread: | SD722 frequency response and aliasing @ 192k, recordingbird |
| Next by Thread: | Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Wild Sanctuary |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU