I would be curious the advantage of this over say the new M-Audio=20
Microtrack 2496. I see that the Core Sound will do 192, but honestly,=20
that's overkill. Otherwise, on paper anyway, the M-Audio seems better=20
in most ways, smaller, lighter, MUCH cheaper.
I've just ordered the M-Audio, should be here this week, and I'll=20
report a bit after I've had a chance to play with it.
Tim
On Sep 25, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Martyn Stewart wrote:
> http://www.core-sound.com/pdaudio_system/1.php
>
> I would appreciate any feedback from the above link, I do not own=20
> one of
> these but I have had an e-mail from a woman who intends to use it=20
> in New
> Zealand this November, she wants to record ambient sounds and also=20
> concerts,
> personally I would not go down this road but who knows!!
> Anyone here familiar with the system including the mic?
>
> I would think handling noises would also be a problem with it?
>
> Martyn
>
> ****************************************
> Martyn Stewart
> Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
> http://www.naturesound.org
> Redmond. Washington. USA
> N47.65543 W121.98428
>
> e-mail:
> Tel: 425-898-0462
>
> Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
> *****************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> Visit your group "naturerecordists" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|